Waltham Forest Council related stories 2008


press index
Re: [Walthamstow, E17] "£884,000 for the EMD" Waltham Forest Yahoo e-list January 10, 2008
If redemption fails, you can still use the free bathroom The Economist, January 5th 2008
Sickened by attacks on McGuffin Film Society Waltham Forest Guardian, April 10, 2008
Film society hits back over 'smear' campaign Waltham Forest Guardian, April 10, 2008
I could have died if I'd ignored symptoms Waltham Forest Guardian, May 15, 2008
Watch out, chest pain may signal heart attack Waltham Forest Guardian, May 22, 2008

Re: [Walthamstow, E17] "£884,000 for the EMD"


In December 1999 English Heritage invited residents of Walthamstow to take part in a consultation over whether the ABC Cinema in Hoe St (subsequently the EMD, formerly the Granada) should be Grade II* listed. The building was already Grade II listed but the idea was to gold plate the listing. Grade II* listing was agreed.

In 2000 the cinema celebrated its 70th anniversary by showing a film from every one of the previous seven decades.

In November 2000 ABC announced the closure of the cinema, telling the public that they would have to go to Woodford or Stratford to see films for at least two years until a new cinema was opened in Walthamstow. At the time the most likely place for the new cinema seemed to be the Selborne Walk redevelopment in Walthamstow town centre.

Mohan Sharma bought the former Granada from ABC in November 2000, announcing that he planned to show Indian language films. Eccentrically he opened the cinema at the beginning of Ramadam. Mr Sharma is a Hindu.

In March 2001 Katy Andrews and I, the joint founders of McGuffin (the organisation was named by me) appeared in the local press with cinema luminary Leslie Hardcastle, to announce that we had agreed with Mr Sharma that McGuffin's would show the Indian art house classic The Adversary, at the cinema. Several McGuffin's presentations at the cinema followed.

In August 2002 the Universal Church of the Kingdom of God bought the cinema. The building closed as a cinema in January 2003 (five years ago) and was not restored (as UCKG planned and in fact achieved at a similar cinema in Finsbury Park) because UCKG lost a planning appeal. At the time the church might have had problems restoring the cinema anyway, since it had attracted a lot of bad publicity thanks to the Victoria Climbie case. This probably resulted in a reduction in its income. It also probably resulted in a reduction in its need for large halls to hold religious events in, like the former Walthamstow Granada.

In 2008 it is not surprising that some would like to see a new cinema in Walthamstow. But it is a shame to see the old building crumbling into dereliction when there was a perfectly viable scheme to restore it.

It is also a fact of life that religious enthusiasm waxes and wanes. For example, in America the considerable religious enthusiasm during which odd things happened, like the election of George Bush as president, seems to be receding. It would be a shame if the tide of religious enthusiasm runs out in England before UCKG gets the chance to restore the Granada.

Of course, other things might happen. Pigs might fly. A Bollywood cinema might open at the beginning of Ramadam again. But I wouldn't count on it. Would you?

Jonathan Brind

On Thursday, Jan 10, 2008, at 14:44 Europe/London, jackie wrote: Thanks for clarification. In a way i am glad about it ...Walthamstow needs a new cinema more than it needs more retail space.

It's a shame the old Granada has been let go to ruin, but if we can't have a cinema on the old site, then one in the Arcade development is better than none. ---

philipherlihy wrote:At the demo on Saturday some folk were holding posters with the above message, and I was told this represented a sum earmarked for consultants to "look into" the possibility offinding space for acinema in the Arcade development. I've asked about this, and this is what I was told: "The figure referred to is not payment for consultants to look into the possibility of a cinema on the Arcade site, nor is it a subsidy to the developer. The Council has however agreed to accept a lower payment from the developer for a scheme on the Arcade site that includes a cinema.
From: "caramelquin"
Date: Mon Jan 14, 2008 19:07:25 Europe/London
To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Walthamstow, E17] Re: "£884,000 for the EMD" ?
Reply-To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com

To clarify this issue of the EMD's price...

The UCKG bought it from Mr Sharma for £2.8m (not including the Gravesend lease). I know this for a fact because when I was giving evidence to the public enquiry the inspector asked for proof that the UCKG had paid over the odds for the building, so I sent off to the land registry, got the information and submitted it (it, erm, didn't occur to the council or their lawyers to do this!)

A later survey commissioned by the LDA, with a view to a CPO, valued the building at £1.5m. It is presumably worth less now in real terms on account of its state of repair. And n.b. that because of it being highly listed and its use being restricted, the value of the property won't have rocketed because it cannot be turned into housing, shops, etc.

So the UCKG paid £1.3m over the odds on the presumption that they'd get the planning permission they sought. And now they are unwilling, as best I can tell, to sell it at a loss. Which is why no-one has successfully bought it.

To be clear, if the council is willing to invest nearly £1m in the future of a cinema in Walthamstow, I want to know whether they'd be equally willing to use that money to subsidise a purchase of the EMD (or to bankroll a CPO of it) for cinema use. This could make the existing offers to buy the cinema instantly more viable. (And I too can vouch for the fact that such offers do exist - I've personally met with one of the bidders, who had a cinema chain on board and everything.)

The irony is that, despite all the local interest, councillors still haven't realised how much they have to gain from playing such a role in saving the EMD!

Caramel

P.S. I am *delighted* to see that this issue is still alive and well. I haven't seen so many posts on a subject for ages. It's clear - from this and the huge crowds gathered outside the cinema the other night - that the EMD will not die!!!


To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com
From: j@brind.tv
Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 18:27:33 +0000
Subject: Re: [Walthamstow, E17] Re: "£884,000 for the EMD" ?

This would make no sense since buildings are expensive to keep idle. And buildings dilapidate. The Granada had significant problems five years ago and I would guess that the situation is much worse now.

If there really had been considerable interest in the purchase of the building someone would have made them a sensible offer. The fact that UCKG has not sold suggests this has not happened.

This is not really surprising since there are very limited use possibilities for the building and it is inherently difficult and expensive to develop a grade II* listed building.

You presume that Mr Sharma sold the building to the UCKG for silly money, I doubt that was true. I think the price was actually likely to have been modest for a very large building in the centre of Walthamstow.

Jonathan Brind


On Sunday, Jan 13, 2008, at 18:12 Europe/London, Simon M wrote:

These include a conference company, an Indian wedding company, and several cinema-related ventures. Given this, it seems clear that the UCKG are not holding out for a non-cinema company, but are holding out for a silly money bid so they aren't seen to lose money on their original purchase.


From: John Leeming
Date: Mon Jan 14, 2008 15:03:04 Europe/London
To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Walthamstow, E17] Re: "£884,000 for the EMD" ?
Reply-To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com

I understood at the time that £2.8m was paid for both, but since I understand that the church only bought the lease of the Gravesend EMD, not the freehold, then the Walthamstow cinema probably accounted for the lion's share of the £2.8m.

After the church moved out of the Gravesend EMD, it mysteriously burned to the ground.

John L.


From: "Simon M"
Date: Sun Jan 13, 2008 18:12:47 Europe/London

Posted by: "Jonathan Brind" j@brind.tv Until someone actually publishes a viable scheme involving the purchase of the cinema from the UCKG I continue to be extremely sceptical. That is your right. But as several people closely involved with the campaign have testified on here, there have been very serious and firm bids to the UCKG for appropriate sums. These include a conference company, an Indian wedding company, and several cinema-related ventures. Given this, it seems clear that the UCKG are not holding out for a non-cinema company, but are holding out for a silly money bid so they aren't seen to lose money on their original purchase.


On Saturday, Jan 12, 2008, at 16:18 Europe/London, Chris Rollings wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: john pridige
Building a new cinema next to a perfectly viable building is madness -

That's an opinion of course. Personally, I'd prefer a nice modern multi-screen building similar to those in Wood Green, Enfied, Ilford, etc., with modern eateries and entertainment sections underneath. With the bus and tube station so close, the amount of business such a complex would generate for the area would be brilliant, putting us back on the map as a place for youngsters to come to in the evening, instead of being a place to get away from. If there was enough space, it would be good to see bowling or similar in the same complex (like in Ilford).


From: John Leeming
Date: Sat Jan 12, 2008 11:29:58 Europe/London
To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Walthamstow, E17] "£884,000 for the EMD" ?
Reply-To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com

Katy Andrews wrote: > First, thanks for pointing out that the church that > met in the Granada when it was run by EMD didn't use > the main auditorium but cinema 3. I think they may > also have used the foyer to begin with, but that > wouldn't have been soundproofed!

They (the "Precious Stones") were already using Cinema 3 during ABC days, but I can't ever recall them using the foyer - not for services, anyway. The Cinema Organ Society often ran shows in the main theatre at the same time, and although we could hear their music faintly, it was not a problem when the organ was playing.

They were very friendly people, and we used to help them get their equipment stored away at the end of the show so that the films could start on time.

On one occasion it became apparent that our radio mike was using the same frequency as theirs, and when the organist switched the mike to address the audience, we suddenly had loud guitar and keyboard music being relayed through the PA system!
Happy days!
John L.


From: Chris Rollings
Date: Mon Jan 14, 2008 19:39:14 Europe/London
To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Walthamstow, E17] Re: "£884,000 for the EMD" ?
Reply-To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com

----- Original Message -----
From: Katy Andrews
What we have is essentially a modern two-screen cinema,

Yikes. They weren't quite what you'd call modern day cinemas. Screen 3 was like watching a large Plasma in a pub, and the Screen 2 was hard to see through the sea of other people's heads owing to the bad seating design. Modern day cinemas have this a bit more sorted!


From: Katy Andrews
Date: Tue Jan 15, 2008 10:30:03 Europe/London
To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com

In answer to Kit's posting at the end of last week, the point was that the year EMD opened at the Granada the new moon for the month of Ramadan fell on a Friday evening. Mr. Sharma chose to open his cinema, which was only allowed to show films in the ethnic languages of India, on that particular Friday evening - at a time when practically the entire Asian community in the area would be in the local Mosques or eating at home!

It wasn't just a silly business decision, but showed that Mr Sharma was completely out of touch with his main potential audience.

I'm not aware of anyone having complained about feeling offended, and as far as I know most people who realised what he'd done found it amusing. I did!

A better analogy might be a Christian opening a bagel shop in Stamford Hill on the eve of Yom Kippur (major Jewish fast day), but even then it's not a good match as anyone can eat bagels whereas not everyone can understand Punjabi/Urdu/Hindi/Gujurati/Tamil etc.

Anyway, just thought I'd clarify.
Katy.


From: Chris Rollings
Date: Thu Oct 4, 2007 19:28:05 Europe/London
To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Walthamstow, E17] Re: Cinema
Reply-To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com

----- Original Message -----
From: philipherlihy

>Quite. Pickett's Lock is a desolate, soulless place.

In contrast, I find the Wood Green Showcase or the Enfield Cineworld fascinating buildings with excellent and amazingly comfortable auditoriums (auditoria?) allowing one to fully enjoy the film watching experience.

I look forward to the day we get a similar modern complex in Walthamstow.


From: "Ian F."
Date: Wed Jan 16, 2008 03:17:31 Europe/London
To:
Subject: Re: Re: [Walthamstow, E17] Re: "£884,000 for the EMD" ?
Reply-To: walthamstow@yahoogroups.com

The rave that didn't seem to have any connection to the network of people involved in organising underground parties in squatted old buildings around London occuring at that time. People weren't in the habit of destroying listed buildings, it creates bad press. Ian

> That is no reason to close the Granada down, however
> - it is a reason to replace and upgrade the screens
> (which would be necessary anyway as both were damaged
> during the rave that took place shortly after the UCKG
> took the building over).
> Katy.

Waltham Forest Yahoo e-list January 10, 2008
Click to return to index



If redemption fails,
you can still usethe free bathroom
Brazil

SÃO PAULO


Edir Macedo (pictured above) and his Universal Church have prospered by offeringa religion "of results" to the upwardly mobile

THE Tuesday-lunchtime exorcism at theSao Paulo cathedral of the UniversalChurch of the Kingdom of God is well-attended, as always. On stage a woman in abrown trouser suit is moaning into a microphone, her back to the audience. Hervoice flits uncontrollably between grufflow tones and high-pitched squeaks. Thisis the devil talking. He has been with herever since the mistress of her philanderinghusband went to an African cult and put aspell on her. The congregation prays, thepriest puts his hands on her and the devilis cast out, leaving its former host exhausted and shivering.

Brazil is fertile land for Pentecostalism,a strain of Christianity characterised bythe belief that God performs miraculousworks for his faithful so regularly that theycan be written into a timetable. The bestguess of the World Christian Database, anAmerican statistical service, is that Brazilhas 24m Pentecostal Christians, comparedwith 5.7m in the United States, where modern Pentecostalism began.

The Universal Church is only the third biggest Pentecostal group in Brazil, but it is the most ambitious. It has branches in 172countries, but in Brazil it also has its ownpolitical party (the Partido RepublicanoBrasileiro, or PRB) and owns Rede Record,the second-largest television network(which includes a 24-hour news channel).

The man behind this religious conglomerate is Edir Macedo, known by hisfollowers as "the Bishop". One of theworld's most successful religious entrepreneurs, he does not give interviews. But twoof his journalists have recently publishedhis authorised biography, "The Bishop: theRevelatory Story of Edir Macedo".

Despite the subtitle, the book gives little away. He describes his arrest for charlatanism in 1992 as a blow "like a heart attack", but does not deal with the substanceof the allegation (he was released after just12 days). The book is long on trivia (Mr Macedo confides that his favourite cologne isAcqua di Parma and discusses his large collection of Italian silk ties). But there is nothing on the church's finances.

Mr Macedo was born to a fairly comfortable middle-class family that becameless so when his father died. He and hisbrothers hawked snacks made by theirmother round the industrial districts ofSao Cristovao, in Rio de Janeiro state. MrMacedo got his first regular job in the Riostate lottery, thanks to a family politicalconnection. He studied at night. His description of his conversion from Catholicism is oddly muted.

From its foundation in 1977, the Universal Church has stressed that the faithfulwould be rewarded for sacrifices, usuallyof a financial kind. Followers are asked togive 10% of their income; "the church of results" will then reward them with blessings, in the form of miraculous healing, orsuccess for their families or at work.Church services often revolve around testimonies of such results. "Offerings [to God]are investments," says Mr Macedo.

Selling prosperity theology to the poorattracts criticism from those who believethat the Universal Church exploits the credulity of the desperate. In his book Mr Macedo defends himself robustly. Those whoearn nothing can still come to services andenjoy the large air-conditioned hall and aclean bathroom without paying. Theymay go away determined to succeed, andmight even give up drinking, s1987 beatingtheir wives and join the church. "Whomhave I harmed? That is the question:whom have I harmed?" He attacks theCatholic Church for eulogising poverty.

Mr Macedo's success has broughtgrowing influence in Brazilian public life.He has built Rede Record, bought for $45min 1990, into a powerful rival to Globo, thecountry's leading broadcaster. Though theUniversal Church provides a captive audience for its religious programming, Recordhas grown mainly by showing popularAmerican shows and investing in its owntelenovelas (soaps). It has secured exclusiverights to the Beijing Olympics.

The PRB, founded in 2005, has onlyfour of the 513 seats in the federal Chamberof Deputies. It is driven by pragmatismrather than by ideology (it is not hostile toabortion, for example). Its main purposeappears to be to defend the interests of theUniversal Church by deterring attacksfrom its powerful enemies, which includethe Catholic church and Globo.

Preaching in his Sao Paulo cathedral,Mr Macedo is soothing, his messagebacked by rising chords played on a synthesiser. He asks the congregation to talk toGod, and a couple of thousand privateconversations resonate in the hall. Somepeople start to cry, others hold their armsaloft. Then the Bishop gets on to the subjectof offerings. To sacrifice is divine, he tellsthe congregation. Maybe so, but to deviseingenious business models is human. Θ
The Economist, January 5th 2008 page 43
Click to return to index


Sickened by attacks on McGuffin Film Society
I HAVE been truly sickened by the smear campaign currently running against the McGuffin Film Society.

It has been subjected to a torrent of personal abuse and all manner of ludicrous accusations including secretly working to destroy the EMD Cinema.

If it wasn't for its campaigning, the cinema would already be a church and a magnet for half of London's religious zealots and all the congestion and traffic chaos they would bring with them.advertisement

The residents of Walthamstow owe a debt of gratitude to the McGuffins' for that achievement alone.

Not to mention the countless film and theatre shows, quiz nights and festival events which have entertained thousands of local people over the last six or seven years.

All done by committed individuals with no political axe to grind for the benefit of their community.

P McPherson, Walthamstow.
Waltham Forest Guardian, April 10, 2008



Film society hits back over 'smear' campaign

McGuffin Film Society members protesting with a Dalek in 2006


By SARAH COSGROVE

scosgrove@london.newsquest.co.uk

MCGUFFIN Film Society members have been accused of being "weirdo Stalinists" who are collaborating with the council to keep the EMD cinema closed, in a furious row onthe Guardian's website.

But members and their supporters have hit back, saying the society is the victim of a smear campaign.

The row broke out in the comment section of a story about overcrowded churches and has attracted a staggering 154 posts so far.

People have alleged negative for McGuffin failing to bring the cinema in HoeStreet, Walthamstow, back into use despite seven years of campaigning.

They accused the society of being everything from a secretive but ineffectiveclique, to an organisation infiltrated with spies, providing a smokescreen forthe council and developers interested in the Arcade site next door.

Alan J, of Walthamstow, said: "McGuffin seems to be run by hot air specialistswho have no interest in the EMD except to have a venue to hold their meetings andprivate film showings."

Members fought back, refusing the claims and saying they had nothing tohide.

Laura O'Connell, of Leytonstone, said members had already put up a lot oftheir own money but had always intended to find a commercial operator for thecinema, currently owned by the Universal Church for the Kingdom of God(UCKG).

But she added: "At least five offers were made, of which one was brokered ontwo occasions by McGuffins.

"However, the church refused all offers."

Other web users defended the society.

Mary W, of Leytonstone, said campaigners had "clearly been led up the garden path by the council" which promised to buy the cinema by compulsory purchase order but instead gave £880,000 to a developer to build a cinema next door.

Richard, from Walthamstow said: "I think it's truly disgraceful that so manypeople are slating the McGuffins.

"They are ordinary people who have got off their ar**s and done what bestthey could."

But the detractors would not let up, leaving members and others to suspect asmear campaign.

McGuffins' chairman John Pridige said: "This is so ludicrous as to be borderline libellous.

"To accuse us of having a hidden agenda is to imply we are making, or stand to make, some kind of profit from our actions.

"The truth is, we have actually lost money."
Waltham Forest Guardian, April 10, 2008



I could have died if I'd ignored symptoms


Neil Gerrard at a recent Workers' Memorial Day ceremony outside thetown hall (EL7932-6)


ONE man who knows the dangers of ignoring the warningsigns is Walthamstow MP Neil Gerrard, who has recentlyrecovered from a quadruple heart bypass operation.

Mr Gerrard, 65: had chest pains for three or four monthsbefore his heart trouble was diagnosed.

He said: "I did not reallyunderstand the symptoms. Ithought I was suffering fromindigestion or heartburn."

Luckily for Mr Gerrard hehappened to have an occupational health check in Januaryand was diagnosed with angina, before being referred to StBartholomew's Hospital in theCity of London for surgery.

He said: "If I had not beendiagnosed I don't know whatwould have happened. I couldhave had a heart attack."

Mr Gerrard is now recoveringand has offered to help the BHFwith its Doubt Kills campaign.

He said: "If you are gettingpains, particularly chest pains,go and get it checked out tomake sure."

Mr Gerrard praised theWhipps Cross UniversityHospital cardiac rehabilitationcourse, which provides help,advice and support to peoplewho have had heart surgery.
Waltham Forest Guardian, May 15, 2008


Watch out, chest pain may signal heart attack



IT is good to see that NellGerrard is looking so wellafter his bypass operation.

And he is certainly rightto suggest that people withchest pains should getcheckups.

I think this may go doublyfor anyone who has servedas a Waltham Forest councillor.

Of the 31 Labour councillors who were elected alongwith Neil and myself in the1986 council election, fourhave either died of heartattacks or died suddenly,according to their obituaries, and I presume they hadheart attacks.

The oldest of them was 73,the youngest was probablyMohamed Khan who wasjust 58 when he died in 1994.

Of course, my friendJohnny Walsh lived to be 90but Johnny was always anexception to anything.

Jo Brind,
Leyton.
Waltham Forest Guardian, May 22, 2008


Heading



Waltham Forest Guardian, ????, 2008