There is clearly something wrong here. The alleged father is only three years old than his oldest son! This information comes from the 1881 census.
| Thomas | ??? | Emma |
| b 1856/7 | b. 1851/2 | |
| 1881 census | 1881 census |
| || |
| Edward | Richard | Hannah | Eliza | Lewis | Albert | Sarah | George |
| 1881 census | 1881 census | 1881 census | 1881 census | 1881 census | 1881 census | 1881 census | 1881 census |
| b 1859 | b 1864 | b 1866/7 | b 1869 | b 1871 | b 1872/3 | b 1876/7 | b 1879 |
| See also this family | |||||||
| Labourer | Labourer |
| Return to index | s | Skeleton of tree |